About the Theory of Vaccines:
From Published Sources
Present Theory:
Bulking Up AntiBodies
Present Justification:
Unsupported Propaganda
Too Simplistic:
Doctors Disagree
Fundamental Flaw:
Two Poisons Not One
Not Real Immunity:
Real Immunity Lasts
Immunity Without AntiBodies:
No Need for Vaccines
Vaccine Manufacture:
How Vaccines are Made
Need for Attenuation:
Weakened Diseases?
Live vs Inactivated Vaccines:
What's the Difference?
Wild vs Vaccine Created Diseases:
Vaccines have CREATED Diseases
Need for Adjuvants:
Casts Doubt on Vaccine Theory
Need for Preservatives:
Casts Doubt on Vaccine Theory
Existence of Manufacturing Residue:
Casts Doubt on Vaccine Theory
About AntiBodies:
Casts Doubt on Vaccine Theory
About High Dose Vaccines:
Casts Doubt on Vaccine Theory
About Vaccines Spreading Disease:
Yes, Spreading NOT Preventing Illness
About Vaccines Causing Other Diseases:
Yes, Spreading MORE Diseases
About Vaccine Failure:
Yes, US Govt Admits Vaccines Fail
About Unregulated Vaccines:
Even Regulated Drugs are Unsafe
What is the present theory behind vaccines?
I will let the Historyofvaccines.org explain:
"Vaccines work to prime your immune system
against future 'attacks' by a particular disease. There are vaccines
against both viral and bacterial pathogens, or disease-causing
agents. When a pathogen enters your body, your immune system
generates antibodies to try to fight it off. Depending on the
strength of your immune response and how effectively the antibodies
fight off the pathogen, you may or may not get sick. If you do fall
ill, however, some of the antibodies that are created will remain
in your body playing watchdog after you’re no longer sick. If you’re
exposed to the same pathogen in the future, the antibodies will
'recognize' it and fight it off."
What is the present justifications of
vaccines for "vaccine preventable diseases"?
THIS LINK POINTS TO A VIDEO
From a now inactivated link from the CDC: "Vaccines are among the
nation's most important public health tools: they saves lives and
money, protect people (particularly infants and young children)
from unnecessary suffering caused by vaccine-preventable diseases
and improve the quality of life for infants, children, adolescents,
and adults. Since the introduction of safe and effective vaccines,
the United States and most developed countries have experienced at
least a 97% reduction
in the number of cases of vaccine-preventable
diseases of childhood compared to pre-vaccine era levels. Reported
cases of vaccine-preventable diseases in children are currently at
record low levels. However, these diseases can readily return if
immunization levels decline as a result of complacency or other
factors."
The problem is that vaccines have NOT
prevented "vaccine-preventable diseases" as the constant outbreaks
of such diseases prove. Click this link to see outbreaks of
such diseases in highly vaccinated populations.
Why is the present theory of vaccines far TOO simplistic?
C. Garrison Fathman, MD, Associate Director
of the Institute for Immunology, Transplantation and Infection,
has a great answer for this:
"The immune
system remains a black box... It’s staggeringly complex, comprising
at least 15 different interacting cell types that spew dozens of
different molecules into the blood to communicate with one another
and to do battle. Within each of those cells sit tens of thousands
of genes whose activity can be altered by age, exercise, infection,
vaccination status, diet, stress, you name it... That’s an awful
lot of moving parts. And we don’t really know what the vast majority
of them do, or should be doing." (B. Goldman, "The Bodyguard: Tapping
the Immune System’s Secrets," Stanford Medicine, Summer 2011)
In short, antibodies are not the only feature
of the immune system making the presently accepted theory far TOO
simplistic and our reliance on them not as effective as we think.
What did critics of vaccination notice
as the fundamental flaw in the theory of vaccines?
From "Vaccination a curse and a menace
to personal liberty with statistics showing its dangers and
criminality" by James Martin Peebles (pp. 7-8) "...vaccination...
aggravates the disease as there are two poisons now in the system
instead of one for nature to contend against. It is sanitation,
diet, pure air, calmness of mind, confidence, and cleanliness
that modify the small-pox [or any other disease]; all of which
modifiers are infinitely cheaper, safer, and in every way
preferable to [vaccines like the] cow-pox poison, which, if it
does not kill, often marks, maims, and sows the seeds of future
eczema, tumors, ulcers, carbuncles, cancers, and leprosy."
Why are vaccines NOT actually immunizations?
From the descriptions above, it is your
immune system that fights disease by producing antibodies (which
supposedly are they key to fighting disease). From the "National
Vaccine Information Center",
"all vaccines only provide temporary immunity.
Only recovery from natural [illness] will provide lifelong immunity."
That is why vaccines must be "boosted"
(retaken) periodically. Therefore, vaccines are NOT "immunizations"
because they do not immunity that lasts a lifetime. This is not
just the case for chicken pox but for many other diseases. The
important point to remember is that only your immune system can
provide immunity. Vaccines can only be effective if (and that is
VERY doubtful) they strengthen the immune system.
Can immunity be created without anti-bodies?
Yes. According to Suzanne Humphries, MD,
"Children with a deficit in antibody production, called
agamma-globulinemia, recover from measles just as well as
normal antibody producers, and this has been known since
the late 1960s
when vaccines were being developed and
advanced. But antibody response is really the only thing
that is talked about and promoted when it comes to vaccines."
How are vaccines made which "ensures" their effectiveness?
I will let the Pharmacetical Lobby explain:
"Vaccines are made by weakening a natural virus or bacteria, by
using a portion of the virus or bacteria, or by using an empty
virus shell. The weakened product is designed to stimulate an
immune response to a disease without triggering symptoms of a
true infection. In addition to the 'active' ingredients, vaccines
may contain small amounts of other ingredients, some of which are
naturally occurring in the environment and find their way into
our bodies each day through a variety of sources."
Do vaccines only contain "attenuated", weakened disease organisms?
From the
CDC Vaccine Excipient Table: In addition to
weakened or killed disease antigens (viruses or bacteria), vaccines
contain very small amounts of other ingredients – excipients or
media... = These include:* Preservatives , to prevent contamination.* Adjuvants , to help stimulate a stronger immune response.* Stabilizers , to keep the vaccine potent during transportation and
storage.* Cell culture materials , used to grow the vaccine antigens.* Inactivating ingredients , used to kill viruses or inactivate toxins.* Antibiotics , used to prevent contamination by bacteria.
What is the difference between live and inactivated vaccines?
This is an important distinction because LIVE
vaccines do NOT need adjuvants to work while Inactivated MUST have
adjuvants to work. Adjuvants are the most toxic parts of vaccines!
What is the difference between natural disease organisms and vaccine
created (known as vaccine-derived) disease organisms?
Yes! Scientists can tell the difference between
"natural" or "wild" viruses in the environment and the virus strains
found in vaccines (called "vaccine-derived" viruses). The most common
kind of vaccine-derived diseases are:
vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs)
and
vaccine-derived Oka varicella (Chickenpox).
That's right vaccines have CREATED diseases!
Why do the presence of adjuvants cast doubt on the theory
of vaccines?
If
(as noted above) "adjuvants (are needed) to help stimulate a
stronger immune response" that implies that the weakened disease
organisms really do not do their immunization job properly for if
they did, then they would not require the help of adjuvants. Except
where a person falls ill from the disease, how can they know that
their system is ONLY just fighting a toxic adjuvant after it had
already discarded an ineffective disease organism? If the body did,
in fact, discard ineffective diseases then there can be NO immunity
from that disease... and antibodies have only been stimulated to
fight off the toxic adjuvant! So, remind me, what good are vaccines
doing?
Why do the presence of preservatives cast doubt on the theory
of vaccines?
If
(as noted above) "preservatives (are needed) to prevent
contamination, then what contamination are they preventing? Vaccines
by their nature contain viruses or bacteria which are, themselves,
contaminants. So if there are elements in vaccines more toxic than
that, it seems to me, that they are not only ineffective but far
riskier than advertized.
Why do the presence of residue from items "used during manufacture"
cast doubt on the theory of vaccines?
There are "...residual trace amounts of materials
that were used during the manufacturing process and removed. These
include: Cell culture materials, used to grow the vaccine antigens.
For example, egg protein, various culture media. Inactivating ingredients,
used to kill viruses or inactivate toxins. For example, formaldehyde.
Antibiotics, used to prevent contamination by bacteria. For example,
neomycin."
Yikes! Do you want even trace amounts of
this stuff inside your body?
Why do the nature of antibodies cast doubt on the theory
of vaccines?
"Antibodies come in five different classes...
Five types of antibodies are formed in the body: IgG, IgM, IgA, IgD,
and IgE... Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is the most abundant circulating
antibody, making up 80% of the total antibodies and 75% of that
found in serum".
In English? Poisons stimulate antibodies as
do vaccines... there is no way to tell them apart. So the presence
of antibodies cannot be a measure of vaccine effectiveness.
Why do "High Dose Vaccines" cast doubt on the theory
of vaccines?
Here is an official explanation about how
"high dose" vaccines "benefit" seniors:
As the body ages, the immune system gets weaker.
This is a normal part of the aging process. However, a weakened
immune system means the body’s ability to bounce back from disease
is attenuated [weakened] as well. Therefore, seniors are at much
greater risk for flu related complications, and people aged 65 and
older are the population segment hardest hit by influenza."
Sounds good BUT if you have been healthy all
your life... then your immune system did its job and has collected
a lot of date to keep on doing so unless you take a flu shot...
"[this kind of] vaccine is not recommended for
anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction (especially
Guillain-Barré syndrome) to vaccines in the past... [AND in the case
of Fluzone] 105 seniors died after taking part in two Fluzone
high-dose vaccine trials, and 91 died after getting the regular
Fluzone vaccine."
"Not only do flu shots weaken your immune
system, expose you to toxins, and cause allergies and other adverse
reactions, they also don't work."
"[T]he government’s own studies on the
effectiveness of the flu vaccine for the elderly show that they
are not only not effective in preventing the flu, but that the
death rate of those vaccinated increased."
As a senior, I, for one, feel threatened
and not protected by a flu shot because of these:
adverse events, including deaths and...
Guillain Barre Syndrome, Bell's Palsy, encephalitis/myelitis,
optic neuritis, Stevens Johnson Syndrome, and toxic epidermal
necrolysis" for starters!
Why have actual outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations cast doubt
on the theory of vaccines?
From Sciencemag.org: "Get the measles vaccine,
and you won’t get the measles—or give it to anyone else. Right? Well,
not always. A person fully vaccinated against measles has contracted
the disease and passed it on to others. The startling case study
contradicts received wisdom about the vaccine and suggests that a
recent swell of measles outbreaks in developed nations could mean
more illnesses even among the vaccinated."
The Huffington Post agrees!
The Oxford Clinical Infectious Disease site agrees!
From Iflscience.com: "A measles outbreak in
New York City has been traced back to a fully vaccinated patient?
Yes, even two shots of the measles vaccine does not guarantee that
you won’t get it -- or that you won’t give it to someone else, maybe
even someone who has also been vaccinated."
For More Outbreaks Click Here"
Why have other diseases caused by vaccines (unrelated to the disease
"vaccinated against") cast doubt on the theory of vaccines?
Many vaccines also cause other diseases besides
the one for which they are given. For instance, smallpox vaccine often
causes syphilis, paralysis, leprosy, and cancer. Polio shots, diphtheria
toxin-antitoxin, typhoid vaccine, as well as measles, tetanus and all
other shots often cause various other stages of disease such as
post-vaccinal encephalitis (inflammation of the brain,) paralysis,
spinal meningitis, blindness, cancer (sometimes within two years,)
tuberculosis, (two to twenty years after the shot,) arthritis, kidney
disease, heart disease (heart failure sometimes within minutes after
the shot and sometimes several hours later.) Nerve damage and many
other serious conditions also follow the injections.
Does the US Government admit that vaccines can fail?
YES!!! From Pubmed: "Primary vaccine failure to
routine vaccines: There are 2 major factors responsible for vaccine
failures, the first is vaccine-related such as failures in vaccine
attenuation, vaccination regimes or administration. The other is
host-related, of which host genetics, immune status, age, health or
nutritional status can be associated with primary or secondary
vaccine failures. The first describes the inability to respond
to primary vaccination, the latter is characterized by a loss
of protection after initial effectiveness."
However, "failures in vaccine attenuation"
means that the vaccines were made improperly while failures in
"vaccination regimes or administration" means it was improperly
given (not the right time, not the right way, etc). While "host
related failures" are actually your fault because your body
cannot tolerate the poisons in vaccines... which is the failure
of vaccines and not your personal failure.
Vaccines are not regulated: what dangers does that pose?
Supposedly pharmaceutical drugs are very
"rigorously" tested (while vaccines are NOT regulated). Yet
anyone who believes that the FDA does anything to ensure the
safety of anything should read this and visit this link:
"For more than a decade, the FDA has shown
a pattern of burying the details of misconduct. As a result, nobody
ever finds out which data is bogus, which experiments are tainted,
and which drugs might be on the market under false pretenses. The
FDA has repeatedly hidden evidence of scientific fraud not just
from the public, but also from its most trusted scientific advisers,
even as they were deciding whether or not a new drug should be
allowed on the market. Even a congressional panel investigating
a case of fraud regarding a dangerous drug couldn't get forthright
answers. For an agency devoted to protecting the public from bogus
medical science, the FDA seems to be spending an awful lot of effort
protecting the perpetrators of bogus science from the public."
Credits: Various as noted
KEYS:
HOME
Site MAP
Mega Index
Ezine Index
Past Life
Higher Self
All About Us
F-R-E-E:
F-R-E-E
F-R-E-E
F-R-E-E
SERVICES:
Phone
Recorded
Email
Remote
Past Life
Soulmate
Service
BOOKS:
Cure Diabetes
Cure Stress
Cure Depression
Lose Weight
ChakraEnergy
Secrets of
Create Luck
eBook Affiliate
TOOLS:
Our Healing
Our Order
Karma-Brain
CONTACT:
Contact Us
Email Us
Instant Info
GuestBook
Thanks for...
Web Site Hosted by
by